<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heisel.org/blog/2003/04/29/rss-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heisel.org/blog/2003/04/29/rss-change/</link>
	<description>Musings for those in the media who grok, grep, and otherwise get the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Soderberg</title>
		<link>http://heisel.org/blog/2003/04/29/rss-change/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Soderberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandbox.heisel.org/?p=58#comment-9</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hrm.  Well, your RSS feed is indeed standards compliant; unfortunately, it&#039;s so bare of content as to go unnoticed in the hundreds I read each day on the bus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve read a couple of your articles regardless, and it occurs to me to ask if you&#039;ve considered implemented the individual article template inside the RSS feed -- such that the visual resemblance between an individual article&#039;s page on your site and an article&#039;s HTML in the RSS feed is similar, if not exactly so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll try to remember to come back and read up on your articles again someday -- but it&#039;s very hard to distinguish yet another excerpt-driven feed from all the rest.  Your content is incredibly valuable, which makes this doubly frustrating.  Perhaps someday there&#039;ll be a better workflow for this process; until then, I bid you good luck.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrm.  Well, your RSS feed is indeed stan&shy;dards com&shy;pli&shy;ant; unfor&shy;tu&shy;nately, it&#8217;s so bare of con&shy;tent as to go unno&shy;ticed in the hun&shy;dreds I read each day on the&nbsp;bus.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve read a couple of your arti&shy;cles regard&shy;less, and it occurs to me to ask if you&#8217;ve con&shy;sid&shy;ered imple&shy;mented the indi&shy;vid&shy;ual arti&shy;cle tem&shy;plate inside the RSS feed &#8212; such that the visual resem&shy;blance between an indi&shy;vid&shy;ual article&#8217;s page on your site and an article&#8217;s HTML in the RSS feed is sim&shy;i&shy;lar, if not exactly so.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll try to remem&shy;ber to come back and read up on your arti&shy;cles again some&shy;day &#8212; but it&#8217;s very hard to dis&shy;tin&shy;guish yet another excerpt-&#8203;driven feed from all the rest.  Your con&shy;tent is incred&shy;i&shy;bly valu&shy;able, which makes this doubly frus&shy;trat&shy;ing.  Per&shy;haps some&shy;day there&#8217;ll be a better work&shy;flow for this process; until then, I bid you good&nbsp;luck.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

