heisel.org

User registration - not the way?

Thursday | May 27, 2004 | 4:41 pm  

I had a chance to talk with my friend Adrian the other day while he was in Atlanta on a lay­over from a Poyn­ter conference.

We got to talk­ing about some­thing we mutu­ally detest… user registration.

User reg­is­tra­tion, I think, is merely a bad imple­men­ta­tion of a real busi­ness (and edi­to­r­ial) con­cern — that is, get­ting to know your audi­ence.

We should want to know more about our audi­ence — it allows us to pro­vide better con­tent and advertising.

Had our print breth­ern tried to gather more infor­ma­tion about their audi­ence, ear­lier in the game, then cir­cu­la­tion (and maybe the entire con­cept of a news­pa­per) wouldn’t be in the bad shape it is today.

Let’s recap: * Get­ting to know your audi­ence — good * User reg­is­tra­tion (in its cur­rent form) — bad

Over the next few entries, I’d like to tackle imag­in­ing an alter­na­tive to UR. To start, I’m going to list the information/goals that UR tries to serve, and we’ll tackle them individually.

I’d like this to be a com­mu­nity process, so feel free to add your ideas, sug­ges­tions, crit­i­cisms, via com­ments or trackbacks.

The cen­tral idea behind this system is that people are bad at pro­vid­ing data. It’s 3:04 p.m., do you know how truth­ful your UR data is?

I should clar­ify, people are noto­ri­ously bad at giving you data, for the sake of giving you data. And they’re really bad at giving you truth­ful data when what they get in return isn’t tied to the data they’re asked to pro­vide.

If I offer you a muffin for your zip­code, why should you give me, a total stranger, your real zip code.

Now, what if I’m offer­ing you a list of great bak­eries with spec­tac­u­lar muffins that are all near your house. In return, give me your zip code… get the idea?

Drumroll….

Here’s the list of prob­lems our “new UR” should try to solve:

  • What con­tent does the user like to read?
  • What adver­tis­ing or adver­tis­ers would the reader be inter­ested in?
  • What kind of a reader are you (demo/psychographics).
  • Where does the user live?
  • Does the reader sub­scribe to the paper?

While I go and try to find the answers to some of these ques­tions, and maybe a muffin, feel free to write in with other things that we need to know about our users in order to be able to better serve them — then we’ll take stab at trying to find ways to gather them.

Permalink | Comments (1) | Categories: Business

Comments

Jay Small May 27th, 2004 | Link to this comment |

Your “new UR” isn’t far from the real­ity of more advanced reg­is­tra­tion sys­tems already deployed.

My com­pany already tar­gets adver­tis­ing based on expressed inter­ests and related behav­iors on site. As a con­sumer, the more you use our site, the more rel­e­vant the ads should be to you. And we’re not the only ones doing that.

I agree that we, and many others, should do more to match the ques­tions we ask to obvi­ous cus­tomiza­tions of our sites. Again as a con­sumer, if you want cer­tain types of infor­ma­tion sorted cer­tain ways and pre­sented in pri­or­ity over less-​useful types, we should be asking you ques­tions that help us deter­mine how to do that.

And you would then expect to com­plete a reg­is­tra­tion process, even WANT to do it, because the payoff is intu­itive and clear.

So I agree, philo­soph­i­cally, that cur­rent reg­is­tra­tion schemes appear in cus­tomer expe­ri­ence as more a bar­rier, less a moti­vated request for per­son­al­iza­tion. We’re get­ting there, though.

Disclaimer: I work at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of the AJC, Cox Newspapers, Cox Enterprises nor any other party.

Mail carrier N. Sorenson delivering Christmas mail through the snow. (Chicago Daily News/Chicago Historical Society)