<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: User registration &#8211; not the way?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heisel.org/blog/2004/05/27/user-registration-not-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heisel.org/blog/2004/05/27/user-registration-not-the-way/</link>
	<description>Musings for those in the media who grok, grep, and otherwise get the Web.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 15:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Small</title>
		<link>http://heisel.org/blog/2004/05/27/user-registration-not-the-way/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandbox.heisel.org/?p=110#comment-43</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Your &quot;new UR&quot; isn&#039;t far from the reality of more advanced registration systems already deployed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My company already targets advertising based on expressed interests and related behaviors on site. As a consumer, the more you use our site, the more relevant the ads should be to you. And we&#039;re not the only ones doing that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree that we, and many others, should do more to match the questions we ask to obvious customizations of our sites. Again as a consumer, if you want certain types of information sorted certain ways and presented in priority over less-useful types, we should be asking you questions that help us determine how to do that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And you would then expect to complete a registration process, even WANT to do it, because the payoff is intuitive and clear.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So I agree, philosophically, that current registration schemes appear in customer experience as more a barrier, less a motivated request for personalization. We&#039;re getting there, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;new UR&#8221; isn&#8217;t far from the real&shy;ity of more advanced reg&shy;is&shy;tra&shy;tion sys&shy;tems already deployed.</p>

<p>My com&shy;pany already tar&shy;gets adver&shy;tis&shy;ing based on expressed inter&shy;ests and related behav&shy;iors on site. As a con&shy;sumer, the more you use our site, the more rel&shy;e&shy;vant the ads should be to you. And we&#8217;re not the only ones doing&nbsp;that.</p>

<p>I agree that we, and many others, should do more to match the ques&shy;tions we ask to obvi&shy;ous cus&shy;tomiza&shy;tions of our sites. Again as a con&shy;sumer, if you want cer&shy;tain types of infor&shy;ma&shy;tion sorted cer&shy;tain ways and pre&shy;sented in pri&shy;or&shy;ity over less-&#8203;useful types, we should be asking you ques&shy;tions that help us deter&shy;mine how to do&nbsp;that.</p>

<p>And you would then expect to com&shy;plete a reg&shy;is&shy;tra&shy;tion process, even WANT to do it, because the payoff is intu&shy;itive and&nbsp;clear.</p>

<p>So I agree, philo&shy;soph&shy;i&shy;cally, that cur&shy;rent reg&shy;is&shy;tra&shy;tion schemes appear in cus&shy;tomer expe&shy;ri&shy;ence as more a bar&shy;rier, less a moti&shy;vated request for per&shy;son&shy;al&shy;iza&shy;tion. We&#8217;re get&shy;ting there, though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

