heisel.org

Early Web 2.0 braindump

Thursday | April 24, 2008 | 7:05 pm  

I thought I’d take advan­tage of the slow Wednes­day after­noon to try and col­lalesce some thoughts from the first two days of the Web 2.0 Con­fer­ence

  • There are a lot of suit-​types-​with-​PCs here (as opposed to geeks-​with-​macs). I’m guess­ing that means that the “enter­prise” is start­ing to pay atten­tion to all this stuff if they’re send­ing execs, prod­uct man­age­ment folks, etc.

  • OpenID & OAuth are being talked about. A. Lot.

  • OpenSo­cial is as well, to a lesser extent.

  • Data Porta­bil­ity is on a lot of folks’ minds.

  • It seems like a lot of folks are hoping that OpenID + OAuth + OpenSo­cial + Data Porta­bil­ity + As Yet Unknown Social Graph Provider == Face­book killer.

  • The social web is broken. That is, unless you like re-​accounting, re-​friending, re-​profiling, re-​usernaming and re-​passwording with every site you go to.

  • If you’re trying to con­vince your enter­prise to adopt social/Web 2.0 fea­tures, then get them a copy of Groundswell, it’s writ­ten by some folks from For­rester so it has that shiny veneer of expen­sive con­sult­ing. (I’m being a little too hard on them, they did have some good and inter­est­ing points and com­pelling data).

  • Web 2.0 is a stupid term. How­ever, if it gets trans­lated as “talk with and then listen to your customers” then it might worth having yet-​another-​buzzword. Snarky com­ment: Uh, maybe I’m just in the wrong gen­er­a­tion, but why is this such a dif­fi­cult con­cept for com­pa­nies to grasp?

  • Clay Shirky is a smart guy. (Clay, where’s the [RSS](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSS_(file_format) at?). Tra­di­tional media will con­tinue to see a decline in usage as each new gen­er­a­tion of Inter­net users becomes more par­tic­i­pa­tive. If you don’t allow your con­sumers to become cre­ators, shar­ers and com­men­ta­tors of your con­tent, then watch out.

  • Jonathan Zit­train is also a really smart guy. As com­put­ing moves into the cloud (can we come up with a better metaphor) there are some real and seri­ous legal issues to con­sider. If the gov­ern­ment or a mega-​corp doesn’t like your appli­ca­tion hosted on EC2/Google App Engine, what’s more likely: they help you in your legal battle to keep it alive -or- they sus­pend your account to avoid a costly lawsuit.

  • The mobile Web is broken and is a bad idea. One Web, one set of stan­dards is the only way to have an even remote chance at repli­cat­ing the suc­cess of the “Desktop Web”.

  • Yahoo, Google, Amazon, Face­book and others are to Web 2.0 what Microsoft was to Web 1.0 — they want you to develop on their plat­form and be locked into their API. Smart devel­op­ers will remem­ber that the only API we need is HTML/HTTP — play in their gar­dens (walled or oth­er­wise) but live on the Web.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Categories: Business, Programming, Technology

Comments

Maura April 24th, 2008 | Link to this comment |

Oh, thank you on the mobile web being broken.

clifford April 25th, 2008 | Link to this comment |

Wow – sounds a lot like SXSW – except for the smart guys. Thanks for the brain dump.

Post a comment


Disclaimer: I work at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of the AJC, Cox Newspapers, Cox Enterprises nor any other party.

Mail carrier N. Sorenson delivering Christmas mail through the snow. (Chicago Daily News/Chicago Historical Society)