heisel.org

What is Web 2.0 and why do (some) journalists fear it?

Friday | April 25, 2008 | 5:50 pm  

I thought the guys from the O’Reilly Insight Group did a really good job of sum­ming up what “Web 2.0″ is:

  • Lis­ten­ing – To your cus­tomers, read­ers, part­ners, etc.
  • Par­tic­i­pa­tion – Join­ing into the con­ver­sa­tions and rela­tion­ships that those folks are having, and let­ting them par­tic­i­pate in your con­ver­sa­tions and relationships.
  • Trans­parency – Open­ing your­self up, being honest about mistakes
  • Ongo­ing inquiry – Con­tin­u­ally asking your audi­ence about what they’re look­ing for from you, ways to improve, etc.

Don’t those four points sound an awful lot like things that are core to journalism?

  • Lis­ten­ing – To your sources, to your readers.
  • Par­tic­i­pa­tion – Pro­vid­ing infor­ma­tion to create better par­tic­i­pants in a democ­racy. Par­tic­i­pat­ing in the soci­ety via an Op/Ed page.
  • Trans­parency – Isn’t it every journalist’s goal to make as much of the public and pri­vate sec­tors trans­par­ent to the com­mu­nity they serve?
  • Ongo­ing inquiry – Beat report­ing, inves­tiga­tive jour­nal­ism. We are an indus­try of ongo­ing inquiries.

So if “Web 2.0″ and jour­nal­ism are so sim­i­lar, then why are so many jour­nal­ists afraid or hos­tile toward “2.0″ fea­tures on their Web site and “2.0″ sites in general?

I don’t have an answer, and the Web doesn’t need any more spec­u­la­tion, so I’ll just put that ques­tion out there and hope some smarter folks have answers.

Permalink | Comments (4) | Categories: Business, Journalism, Management, Technology

Comments

Brad King May 5th, 2008 | Link to this comment |

I’ve had the ben­e­fit of grow­ing up with tech­nol­ogy (got my first com­puter in 1984) and work­ing in jour­nal­ist (got my first job in 1994) — and I’ve always thought there was a direct rela­tion­ship with each other.

From the open source move­ment to the Hacker ethic, the idea behind tech­nol­ogy has always been — as you point out — sim­i­lar to the idea behind jour­nal­ism. Why that hasn’t trans­lated into the news­room, I’ll never know.

Brian Cubbison May 5th, 2008 | Link to this comment |

I’ll have a go at it.

Lis­ten­ing – We’re more used to speak­ing, writ­ing, pub­lish­ing at people in a one-​way process.

Par­tic­i­pa­tion – We think of our­selves as monks who have cut off com­mu­nity involve­ment in order to remain objective.

Trans­parency – We’re not in the com­mu­ni­ca­tion busi­ness, we’re in the infor­ma­tion busi­ness, and we hope to con­trol and sell the infor­ma­tion we’ve collected.

Ongo­ing inquiry – We pub­lish a story and then it’s on to the next one, with­out look­ing back to see what people are saying, adding to, or chal­leng­ing about what we’ve just published.

It’s chang­ing, though. It starts with a curi­ous mind, which all jour­nal­ists should have.

Chris May 7th, 2008 | Link to this comment |

@Brad – I think you make an excel­lent point… jour­nal­ism and tech­nol­ogy have long been inter­twined in my life and the ethos from almost directly trans­lates to the other.

Chris May 7th, 2008 | Link to this comment |

“It starts with a curi­ous mind, which all jour­nal­ists should have.”

Amen Brian!

Post a comment


Disclaimer: I work at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of the AJC, Cox Newspapers, Cox Enterprises nor any other party.

Mail carrier N. Sorenson delivering Christmas mail through the snow. (Chicago Daily News/Chicago Historical Society)